3/25/2023 0 Comments Exiftool use gps data for taken![]() Apple, Google and Microsoft building simple and functional "Gallery" type applications into their core offerings) and since it is likely that 99% of photos taken these days are created on phones and similar use devices with most potential users kept happy using them, the market for any alternative approach, outside a corporate world or commercial photo-library sales operation, is probably rather small.Īnd then we have the AI "promise" of asking an online application to analyse an image and tell us what or where it is. The problem these days is that the mass market developers offer functionality that provides the mass-market with enough for its purposes (e.g. Preferably an application that has a "life" of its own and can be used independently of any and all image manipulation applications when necessary. I think that is the point at which a full-blown Library system makes clear sense. It is also unlikely that the original XPM file will now have a clear relationship with the output file. At that point, the XMP becomes completely redundant. In some situations, the synchronization alone can become messy.įrom an archiving perspective, it is one more file to store in the right place at the right time and I am not sure that is a good archival practice when in theory a "finished" archived image will have all adjustments applied and embedded - including Metadata. It's basically a data exchange mechanism that requires, as the transfer catalyst, an extra file and a decision about how to use that file - i.e. If you only need to type in coordinates, I would go for Exiftool, it is world class software and it is free (a lot of photograpers owe Phil Harvey a beer :-) If you are not into scripting, you may want to include a Exiftool is XMP sidecar not good for archiving?" I think PM has a 30 day evaluation in case you want to try it. When it comes to setting or adjusting coordinates, PM lets me type them in or adjust a marker on a map. PM is a metadata power tool, I find C1 is not even close. I connected GPS hardware to my Nikons almost two decades ago, the first was a hand held Garmin using serial cable before I moved on to dedicated camera units. PM is always first and last in the chain. Note plural "workflows", I have used quite a few raw image applications in parallel, and I still do. I had used Photo Mechanic (PM) as the front end and back end of my workflows for many years before I got my first Capture One when thy released version 7. > Jean-Michel: classifying and organizing thousands of pictures is also an important job that C1 does quite good, but that can still be improved. ![]() However, I do understand that others may see it as being far more important for their use purposes than I do for mine. Any feature built into any application will have some sort of cost to the consumer associated with it, and so duplicating functionality, especially for occasional use, is not an enticing option as far as I am concerned. I'm not a believer in Free software, although it has its uses sometimes. There would be costs associated with that. One might end up with multiple applications all supporting the same rarely used activity and data storage in slightly different ways and using none of them. I can see the potential appeal but, speaking personally, I'm not sure I would really have a need for it and if I did I could satisfy that need using an "output" files catalog or gallery application with all the useful geo searching and location tools found for it. However, I do wonder how far a RAW convertor with catalogue available needs to carry functionality that gets close to an agency archival application. Therefore activating the IPTC fields seems appropriate and using them during output processing would be a cleaner solution for sounds like Photo Mechanic has set a good and practical standard. The XMP sidecar file is a method for transferring data but not so good, in my opinion, for archiving it. This is why it would be good to have more than one set of fields available to store the data. Thing about the location of the subject is that it is certainly often a variable that is independent of anything the camera could provide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |